i seriously do not like charisma lessons. had a terrible one today. i seriously do not want to spark off an argument with the teacher(of why i feel its handouts are no good/useless/stereotype). i just hope that she knows what is she teaching, both in content and physicologically sound teaching. haha. i mean, she perhaps has no idea what kind of message is she trying to conveying(neither do the students). the statements in the handouts are extremely vague and one has to make many many assumptions before deriving of an answer to the questions. like is it possible that one will feel guilty after sex? again, its really vague. depends!

i realised that these handouts are making the students think that sex is wrong(it may be true).
one time that we might be obliged to agree that one would feel pain in the genital areas after sex(handout question). again, it DEPENDS.

my point is that, its useless to ''make'' students think sex is wrong. but its important to teach that its not necessary in this age. why is it not necessary? it depends again. so why is it important then? its not practical. bottomline.(i'll do a post if you respond XD)
it may be the message that the teacher was trying to convey the message all this while. but it takes too much thinking perhaps to guess it. the way she teaches does not engage the students(its not interesting enough in her speech to engage us or help us to concentrate). hah. its subjective though.

her efforts to teach was undeniably big. i would safely say that. she would run through the whole handout and answer all questions posed. kudos for that. 3 cheers!

its a very personal opinion. plz do not fire me.